Reality Shock: The Highest Property Tax Rates in Cook and Its Collar Counties – WP Original

By: Mark Glennon*

Nobody of any political stripe or party can defend property tax rates now exploding in many communities surrounding Chicago. Aside from rank unfairness, some towns are on a clear road towards self-destruction. The resulting loss in home values is a personal tragedy for those who can least afford it, making this is an issue on which progressives and conservatives must agree. The crisis will worsen because stunningly large, further bills have just been stuck in the drawer, not yet sent — unfunded municipal pension liabilities.

This article collects data on the towns and villages surrounding Chicago with the highest “effective property tax rates.” That’s simply the percentage that annual taxes represent compared to true market value of property. It’s the real rate. It avoids the obfuscation of  nominal rates, equalization factors and other adjustments that plague property tax analyses throughout Illinois, which few understand.

Last week, we wrote about this topic for south suburban Cook County, where exceptionally high rates predominate, dooming the area. This article is about other communities in Cook County and its five surrounding counties — McHenry, Will, DuPage, Lake and Kane.

Some communities have relatively low rates, such as those with a large base of commercial property to tax. Oak Brook’s, for example, is just 1.25%. Others have lower rates because home values are high, so big bills mean lower percentage rates. Lake Forest, Hinsdale and Barrington, for example, have rates under 2%.

Below, by county, are the communities with effective rates over 3%, which I think are into the danger zone, for reasons I will explain. Some others are past that and on to suicide. Any casual look at recent sales data and asking prices says market values and effective rates in the most oppressed communities are worsening, so these numbers may be low. These numbers are extracted from a database on effective rates recently compiled by the Chicago Tribune:

How much is too much? At what point do rates become a self-destructive death spiral driving values down and rates up? Opinions vary and it depends on the community. Your opinion, based on personal familiarity you have with any of these towns, is probably more sound than mine or any experts. In general, however, my sense is that most would agree that rates over 3% are into the danger zone of sparking a downward spiral. Over 4% and it’s is too late. Here’s why:

First, the national average residential effective rate is only about 1.5%, even in urban areas, as reported in this year’s annual report of the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy and Minnesota Center for Fiscal Excellence. (Rural areas have lower rates.) That’s half of what I suggest as the danger zone.

Second, the average 30-year mortgage rate today is under 4%, so taxes over that exceed the cost of a mortgage. However, the real cost of rates over 3% and moving toward 4% is staggering, and truly approaches confiscation.

Thinking of it like a perpetuity is appropriate. Homeowners are putting up their homes as collateral for a perpetuity. The value or cost of a perpetuity, finance professionals correctly say,  is the annual payment divided by market long term interest rates which, again, are well under 4%. So, for example, a family with a home worth $200,000 paying $8,000/year in property taxes (4%) is effectively forced to buy a perpetuity costing over $200,000 — more than the full value of their home. And that obligation is secured by a first lien on their home, ahead of the bank’s mortgage.  “Homeowners” are hardly that; they actually just hold a very junior residual interest.

Finally, the cost in terms of suppressed home values is mind-boggling, and it falls especially hard on the poor and middle class. Home prices in the Chicago area have badly lagged behind other major metro areas over the last ten years, according to the Case-Shiller Index, as we wrote  earlier.

Other causes contributed to that, but high, increasing property taxes are are the most direct and clear reason for that underperformance. Adding up the lost value for the whole Chicago area means tens of billions directly out of the pockets of area homeowners. That loss may be sustainable for people with means, but for the poor and middle class, home equity usually is the only meaningful asset they have.

Property owners in the most oppressed communities around Chicago already know this story, but it has gone largely untold in the press. Kudos to the Chicago Tribune for compiling the database from which effective rates above are taken. But even the Tribune, often said to be financially conservative, missed the story in its own data.  Instead of seeing the high suburban rates, its article announcing the database saw it as proof that city taxes are low. Its headline was, Even with Emanuel hike, city homeowner property tax rates still below suburbs.”

One reporter on this issue is has been Phil Kadner. He’s been writing about it as it developed over  two decades from a liberal’s perspective, mostly for the Tribune’s Southtown section covering the south suburbs. Most recently, he wrote, “The people who suffered most from the property tax debacle were senior citizens driven out of their homes by soaring bills and students in poor communities who received a second-rate education.”

“The answer, by the way, can be found across the border, in the booming suburbs of northwest Indiana,” wrote Kadner. Hat tip to him for being on top of this meltdown since the beginning. Employers and homeowners have been fleeing to Indiana for its business climate and effective property tax rates under 1%.

Note a few things about two Chicago area counties. First, that list above for McHenry County is actually the entire county. That is, all towns in that county have rates over 3%, which is certainly scary. Update: McHenry County residents are fed up, apparently. A new Northwest Herald article details the exodus underway because of property taxes.

Second, you may notice that the highest rates for Cook County are in its south suburbs. That area is clearly in a death spiral, which was the focus of our article last week. Finally, Cook County generally taxes commercial property at 2.5 X the effective residential rate, which is why those rates are separately listed above for Cook County. (The exorbitance of those commercial rates is a separate story.) For the collar counties, however, commercial rates are the same as residential.)

Perhaps most frightening of all, much larger property tax bills remain to be sent out. Most communities with high rates are working class ones with the worst unfunded pension liabilities. Aurora, for example, with rates well over 4%, has police and fire pensions with unfunded liabilities totaling  an absurd $262 million. Elgin, also with rates over 4%, is $175 million behind on pensions. (Elgin’s police, by the way, have an average salary of $95,000/year on top of which the city pays over $60,000/year in pension contributions. That’s not uncommon and we are linking to similar stories about Illinois municipalities.) The list of impossible municipal pension obligations goes on and on. You can see all their numbers in the state’s latest biennial report.

Look, folks, we have an unprecedented, monumental problem, and it’s not a partisan issue.

Many Illinois towns, as well as Chicago and the state, simply are not generating the revenue, growth and jobs they need to pay for the promises they’ve made. Only radical solutions will work. A genuine freeze on effective property tax rates is one way to halt the march towards a death spiral so many municipalities clearly are on. For some others, that won’t do — a roll-back is imperative. If you have other ideas, let’s hear them, but “more revenue” demonstrably isn’t the answer for these communities.

*Mark Glennon is founder of WirePoints. Opinions expressed are his own.