I used to enjoy reading Stephens at the WSJ until his TDS and moral superiority overtook what I thought was a predisposition to rational and logical thought. Dumped the WSJ and Trib years ago though when I took the stand of not enabling Dem propaganda and journalistic corruption.
Same for Maher. When he’s lucid and thinking critically and not emotionally unhinged, he can reach sane conclusions. It’s not often though.
A largely unasked question is becoming glaring: Is Illinois doing all it should to use artificial intelligence to make government cost less and work better? So far, the evidence says no.
I used to enjoy reading Stephens at the WSJ until his TDS and moral superiority overtook what I thought was a predisposition to rational and logical thought. Dumped the WSJ and Trib years ago though when I took the stand of not enabling Dem propaganda and journalistic corruption.
Same for Maher. When he’s lucid and thinking critically and not emotionally unhinged, he can reach sane conclusions. It’s not often though.