"Take Chicago’s mayor’s race as an example. The majority of voters did not cast their ballot for either Brandon Johnson or Paul Vallas in the February election. If Chicago voted with RCV, not only would there not have been an expensive runoff election, but it’s also conceivable that neither of these candidates would be mayor today."
Alaska and Nevada had problems with there RCV. Also in this article voting day is mentioned We have lost that day long ago. Look what happened in Pennsylvania ( senate race). So it’s not up to the voter to change, it will be decided by the parties not voters. Lastly can we not fix the problems we have before moving on to something else.
Victor
3 years ago
Oh hell no.
Hydra
3 years ago
I know absolutely no one who is calling for ranked choice voting. But what I do hear a call for is Voter ID, no drop boxes and the only mail in ballots are requested absentee ballots that are verified. Of course not one of the asked for items is being considered by Democrats who enjoy rigging the game.
Tom Paine's Ghost
3 years ago
If Democrats support it then it’s an undemocratic scam.
A largely unasked question is becoming glaring: Is Illinois doing all it should to use artificial intelligence to make government cost less and work better? So far, the evidence says no.
Alaska and Nevada had problems with there RCV. Also in this article voting day is mentioned We have lost that day long ago. Look what happened in Pennsylvania ( senate race). So it’s not up to the voter to change, it will be decided by the parties not voters. Lastly can we not fix the problems we have before moving on to something else.
Oh hell no.
I know absolutely no one who is calling for ranked choice voting. But what I do hear a call for is Voter ID, no drop boxes and the only mail in ballots are requested absentee ballots that are verified. Of course not one of the asked for items is being considered by Democrats who enjoy rigging the game.
If Democrats support it then it’s an undemocratic scam.
NO. Ranked choice is horrible.