Students Smack Down Chicago ‘Disinformation’ Conference Panelists, Exposing Far More Than Apparent About Media – Wirepoints

By: Mark Glennon*

Traditional media beclowned itself last week at a Chicago conference on “disinformation.” That’s a story in itself, but the bigger story is how they covered up even that story, peddling disinformation about a conference on disinformation. The guilty include Illinois media, which is further guilty of still suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop story that is part of what sparked the fireworks at the conference.

We will describe the most interesting high points from the conference, but first understand that those high points were entirely suppressed by regular media. Articles about the conference in the Chicago Tribune, Chicago Sun-Times, WGN, and Crain’s simply ignored the story. Instead, they fawned over comments made by Barack Obama, who was also a panelist.

Alternate news sources, by contrast, were all over the real highlights, as was social media, where video clips of the fireworks garnered millions of views. Stories about what really happened at the  conference that you won’t find in corporate media include those in RealClear, The Federalist, The Daily Wire, Daily Caller, New York Post, Washington Examiner, The College Fix, Townhall, RedState, American Greatness.

So, this is a story about alternate realities. Decide for yourself which one is right.

Wasn’t the original event farcical enough? Sponsored by The Atlantic and the University of Chicago’s Institute of Politics. It purported to be about “disinformation and the erosion of democracy.”

CNN’s Brian Stelter

Moderated by Democratic strategist David Axelrod, headline panelists included The Atlantic’s Anne Applebaum, Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar and CNN’s Brian Stelter. Yes, that Brian Stelter.

It was therefore only in Q&A that things got interesting, but ignored by regular media. Credit a few intrepid students. A University of Chicago freshman asked Applebaum about Hunter Biden’s laptop. “So, in 2020, you wrote ‘those outside the Fox News bubble do not, of course, need to learn any of the stuff about Hunter Biden,’ referring to his laptop, of course,” he said. “A poll later found out that if voters knew about the contents of the laptop, 16% of Joe Biden voters would’ve acted differently. Of course, we know a few weeks ago The New York Times confirmed that the content is real.”

“Do you think the media acted inappropriately when they instantly dismissed Hunter Biden’s laptop as Russian disinformation and what can we learn from that in ensuring that what we label as disinformation is truly disinformation and not reality?” he asked.

Applebaum’s answer: “My problem with Hunter Biden’s laptop I think is totally irrelevant,” she said. “I mean, it’s not whether it’s disinformation or, I mean, I didn’t think that Hunter Biden’s business relationships have anything to do with who should be president of the United States, so I don’t find it to be interesting, that would be my problem with that as a main news story.”

Is that not smuggery personified? If you don’t know that the laptop is “relevant” and “interesting,” all I can suggest is that you go beyond mainstream media and read about it. And stay tuned because indictments are coming. President Biden himself is in this up to his neck. It is rapidly evolving into one of the biggest scandals in American history.

Another student asked Stelter the obvious:

You’ve all spoken extensively about Fox News being a purveyor of disinformation, but CNN is right up there with them. They pushed the Russian collusion hoax, they pushed the Jussie Smollet hoax. They smeared Justice Kavanaugh as a rapist and they also smeared Nick Sandmann as a white supremacist.  And yes, they dismissed the Hunter Biden laptop affair as pure “Russian disinformation.” With mainstream corporate journalists becoming little more than apologists and cheerleaders for the regime, is it time to finally declare that the canon of journalistic ethics is dead, or no longer operative?  All the mistakes of the mainstream media – and CNN in particular – seem to magically all go in one direction.  Are we expected to believe that this is all just some sort of random coincidence?  Or is there something else behind it?

Stelter gave a lengthy non-answer, dismissing charges against CNN as “a popular right-wing narrative.” I think my honest answer to you […] is that I think you’re describing a different channel than the one that I watch. But I understand that that is a popular right-wing narrative about CNN,” said Stelter.

Barack Obama was a panelist, too. He used the appearance as an opportunity to “rewrite history,” as the Wall Street Journal put it, about his policies toward Russia’s Vladimir Putin.

And Obama offered what was perhaps the single most telling comment about establishment views on disinformation. “It is difficult for me to see how we win the contest of ideas if, in fact, we are not able to agree on a baseline of facts that allow the marketplace of ideas to work,” he said. In other words, facts are what he says they are. All else is disinformation.

Another student asked Sen. Klobuchar, “If I were to say there are only two sexes – male and female – would that be considered misinformation that you think should be banned speech on social media platforms?” With a laugh, Klobuchar answered, “I am not going to get into what misinformation,” and changed the subject to something else.

Clips of those exchanges were already roaring on social media by the end of the conference.

The Atlantic’s Editor Jeffey Goldberg and David Axelrod giving concluding remarks,

So, in response, The Atlantic’s Editor Jeffey Goldberg offered this closing remark. “I think one darkly humorous but inevitable measurement of our success is that our disinformation conference has been the subject of disinformation campaigns on social media already.”

That’s routine for today’s radical left. Just say “disinformation” or “right wing” in response to any competing viewpoint. That’s the extent of their analysis. And you’d hope they’d know better than to punch down at students.

The students who asked the questions were from The Chicago Thinker, a student publication at the U of C. It’s a golden ray of hope in higher education. Their tagline is “Outthink the mob.” They do that splendidly but, as this episode showed, getting the mob to report on itself is a different matter.

The most serious loose end from the conference, from an Illinois perspective, is about that Hunter Biden laptop. Even the New York Times and Washington Post have belatedly admitted that it and the damning emails in it are authentic. However, I can find no mention about its authenticity or recently released content in any Illinois paper. Much of Illinois media however, did print earlier stories saying or alleging that the laptop was a fake, planted by Russians. They’ve let a huge but solidly disproven conspiracy theory live on.

*Mark Glennon is founder of Wirepoints

47 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Silverfox
4 years ago

Indeed, we need an investigation to ascertain if Hunter did anything wrong, but also to find out if  the President aided or benefited from any wrongdoing.  The evil here is not so much that some are pre-judging the President, though that is, of course, wrong, but that those in a position to do so, will not even bring the wrongdoing to light.  And do so, in a timely fashion.  Might it have made a difference in the vote you cast if you knew the candidate you were considering helped a criminal in an illegal enterprise ?  The horror is in the mainstream media deciding that… Read more »

Doris M Davis
4 years ago

Well, since there’s an investigation ongoing here n Hunter Biden, who is not our president, I prefer to hold judgment until the investigation results come in. If Hunter is charged with a crime he will have to face the consequences, but he’s still not our president! I think it’s misinformation to try to link our president to any wrongdoing of his son, which is what the far-right scream about until it’s their child!

Thee Jabroni
4 years ago
Reply to  Doris M Davis

LETS GO BRANDON!!

Brock Landers
4 years ago
Reply to  Doris M Davis

Put down the glue gun, Doris.

Joey Zamboni
4 years ago
Reply to  Doris M Davis

Replace JB & HB with DT & DT Jr. would that change things…?

Opa
4 years ago
Reply to  Joey Zamboni

Absolutely. The Ts can do know wrong. And, if course, Kushner’s “investment” from MBS is just a normal business transaction. Even though the Saudi experts strongly advised against the deal. Influence peddling? Nah.

Thee Jabroni
4 years ago
Reply to  Doris M Davis

oh yeah doris,joe biden had no knowledge of what his son was doing,REALLY!!?after all hes the “big guy”-wake up doris and quit pretending

Rick
4 years ago
Reply to  Doris M Davis

Influence peddling, Hunter was the bag man selling it. Do you seriously think he gets on the board of a Ukranian oil holding company Burisma for a no-show gig because of his deep energy sector knowledge? Or did he get there because his dad was VP? C’mon Doris I know you didn’t just fall off a turnip truck. Or maybe I can sell you this bridge I have in Brooklyn.

Thee Jabroni
4 years ago
Reply to  Rick

typical lying leftist,they all live in la la land,does anyone take these goof balls serious?

Opa
4 years ago
Reply to  Rick

And the MBS “investment” with Jared????

ProzacPlease
4 years ago
Reply to  Opa

Does it make any difference that Jared is not a crackhead?

Ataraxis
4 years ago
Reply to  Doris M Davis

Doris,
Hunter’s email said “10 held by H for the Big Guy”.
What percentage would Hunter need to hold for the “Big Guy” for you to consider this real email to be pertinent information about Hunter’s Dad, i.e., the “Big Guy”?

Aaron
4 years ago
Reply to  Doris M Davis

so, Biden is your president? Just wondering if you admit it Doris.

Heath Newland
4 years ago

Because its all politics. the Wall St Journal that pointed out Barry trying rewrite history didn’t mention the US coup in the Ukraine in 2014 (search Victoria Nuland Fuck the EU) which toppled the elected somewhat pro Russian govt and put us on the road to this nonsense.

debtsor
4 years ago
Reply to  Heath Newland

Victoria Nuland recently admitted under oath that there were US funded biological labs in Ukraine….wait what???

Waggs
4 years ago

There’s no such thing as “misinformation”. It’s just information.. to be analyzed, disseminated, and debated until enough is gathered and either conclusively verified or debunked. You weren’t “misinformed”. You were either lied to or you made an incorrect inference from the information given. So, those who pound the drumbeats of war against “misinformation” are either deliberately withholding information to prevent certain conclusions from being drawn or outright lying. Either way, they’re horrible people.

Rick
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark Glennon

Musk knows trust in Twitter is eroding, more people every day see that Twitter has become just a mouthpiece. My dad always told me the best cure for speech you don’t like is more speech. If Twitter is going to filter everything they will be a dying company. Shadow banning, canceling, demonetizing, redefining language and more are the stuff Twitter is made of. It is designed to cyber attack our culture. Its not made of liberty and free speech within the law. It may happen on a slow curve, but eventually Twitter will lose all trust and credibility if there… Read more »

Last edited 4 years ago by Rick
Hunter's Lap Dance
4 years ago
Reply to  Rick

The people that run twitter would live with a $5 share price as long as they could keep out speech they don’t like. That’s how committed those new age communists are silencing people they disagree with.

debtsor
4 years ago

Yes, this is correct. Twitter doesn’t need to make much money. The board knows this. Twitter is a leftwing chatroom and conservatives aren’t really invited. They ban us not because they are afraid of free speech but because they are vindictive and hate us. Listen to the words of twitter employees, the ones who ban. They believe that conservatives are bad evil people, and if they are allowed to speak freely, their speech would endanger and harm marginalized groups. Who are marginalized groups? The very same people who happen to have all the power to run Twitter! There are conservatives… Read more »

Susan
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark Glennon

Gab offered Musk large interest in their alternative platform (independent Twitter competitor, repeatedly smeared as right-wing, uncensored, and seeking full decentralized status).
The problem is ISP: internet service providers. Until a fully decentralized network is solidified, uncensored free speech publishers are at risk of being “taken off the air”.
Musk’s satellite internet would provide the solution: reliable ISP, uncensorable.

debtsor
4 years ago
Reply to  Susan

There also needs to be interoperability between platforms which does not exist at all. It’s the network effect of where there is a walled garden and if you’re not in the garden, then you are on the outside and looking in. All of the early internet systems have interoperability, most famously email. Imagine if you could email people ONLY within your certain email program? That’s what Direct Messaging (DM’s) is on Twitter. But if I could post something on Gab and have someone using Twitter or Parler respond to me…..that’s what we should be aiming for, an open source idea… Read more »

Susan
4 years ago
Reply to  debtsor

Yes. We see that the current old guard garden-gate-keepers are deliberately selective. And, users thus far have gone along with that, rationalizing that we “need” to be in that garden.
Freedom requires enough people to foreswear the easy, available thing and shift usage to a new open network, which would in turn force interoperability ( because the old regime no longer has a product perceived to be crucial).

Rick
4 years ago

Institutions, services, governments, media that have to censor is proof that they have little confidence in their own argument, values, theories, beliefs. Freedom of speech, questioning, etc. is a threat to these folks. “Misinformation” has become just another way to label speech at the outset to avoid a challenge. Much like the function the word “racist” has taken on. When a freshman journalist student can stump a panel of these folks to the point where their only comeback is “its time for lunch” or “hunter biden just isn’t interesting” you know they are weaklings.

Last edited 4 years ago by Rick
jajujon
4 years ago

Amy Klobuchar: “I am not going to get into what misinformation . . .” So why was she invited as a panelist to a conference on dis/misinformation? Surely she didn’t think the conference was on improving the state of journalism. A stage full of empty suits.

I’m smiling that The Chicago Thinker students lit up a few of these elitist lumps.

Thee Jabroni
4 years ago
Reply to  jajujon

what a freaking joke,who exactly determines what is mis information!?-these pompous left wing dopes think theyre so much smarter than we are,guess what leftists,youre not,just look at Kamala Harris,she tries so hard to look intelligent,what a freaking dopey disaster,my 10 year old has more common sense than that dipshit

Pat S.
4 years ago
Reply to  Thee Jabroni

My parakeet has more common sense than Kamala.

debtsor
4 years ago
Reply to  Thee Jabroni

Misinformation is merely anything your political opponent has to say. It’s a bad faith argument.

JackBolly
4 years ago

Being a clever liar does not make you smart. Obama and the Leftist media mentioned are all just clever liars.

Go Deeper
4 years ago

The point of news propogandists isn’t to convince their audience of the “truth”. The point is to convince everyone who knows better that enough mouth breathing morons actually believe this stuff enough to support it. The polls are faked either outright or in their structure to create a preordained outcome. When they don’t anticipate it, Hillary loses and Trump wins in an “upset.” 81 million isn’t believable unless there are 81 million mouth breathers out there. Here’s a hint: there aren’t.

debtsor
4 years ago
Reply to  Go Deeper

Mainstream news audiences are shrinking massively. More people listen to talk radio at 11:00 CST than all mainstream evening news. However, mainstream media still takes the vast majority of the advertising dollars because brands dislike the sustained efforts of the left to badger and harass any business that advertises on conservative media outlets. I saw some tweet the other day from some blue check crazy person who said they were going to lead a boycott of Marriott Hotels because the TV was tuned to Fox News in the workout room. Sleeping Giants is a leftwing organization that exists solely to… Read more »

Last edited 4 years ago by debtsor
ProzacPlease
4 years ago
Reply to  debtsor

I wonder if the ubiquitous drug company ads selling products that consumers cannot go out and buy are actually a way of funneling money to compliant media outlets. Ratings don’t matter if the goal is not really to sell the product.

Pat S.
4 years ago
Reply to  ProzacPlease

I miss the good old days when drug companies were prohibited from advertising prescription drugs.

Close your eyes and listen to the audio on those commercials and hear all the ways the product can harm or kill you. The happy people on the video are only a distraction.

Maybe that’s where the White House got the idea of trying to distract the American people from the mess they’ve made of our country … with utter nonsense.

It’s a bad joke; a very bad joke.

Pensions Paid First
4 years ago
Reply to  Pat S.

“Close your eyes and listen to the audio on those commercials and hear all the ways the product can harm or kill you. The happy people on the video are only a distraction.” Drug commercials are required to offer “fair balance” in all of their ads. 15 seconds of efficacy? Then you will need to offer all the side effects that could happen even if the chances are extremely small compared to placebo. Also, those ads are run because they are effective. A large percentage of patients suffer from a particular disease but don’t know what to do about it… Read more »

debtsor
4 years ago

Yes, but……that’s assuming that the drug that is being sold is actually effective for that condition. The FDA approves a lot of drugs that are marginally effective over a placebo. There’s a lot of snake oil out there.

Thee Jabroni
4 years ago
Reply to  debtsor

Pharma ad-Suffering from depression?,take Zoloft for depression,side effects include-nausea,bloody nose,blurred vision,hemeroids,loss of hair,loss of taste,bleeding from the genitals,finger nails falling off,suicidal tendencies,liver cancer,runny nose,runny stool,rectangular scarring,yellowing of the teeth,acne,covid 19 symptoms,protuding belly,loss of direction and severe craving for pizza with coconut on it,and alcoholism.

Pensions Paid First
4 years ago
Reply to  debtsor

Who defines marginally? The FDA approves drugs based on efficacy and safety. Doctors then prescribe said drugs based on said data. Insurance companies don’t want to pay for medicines that are only “marginally effective”. Patient ultimately decides if those drugs should be taken and/or pay costs if needed or wanted. If the effectiveness is only helpful at the margins then don’t take it. If the doctors are prescribing marginally effective drugs then find a different doctor. Choices are great. The ads are merely providing data, both good and bad, to help patients decide. If you are against ads you are… Read more »

Opa
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark Glennon

Spot on description of Fox “News”

Pat S.
4 years ago
Reply to  Opa

If you rely solely on main stream media to be informed, you are missing much of what is really going on in our country and the world.

I am a fan of both and consider myself well informed.

If you only hear half of a discussion you miss a lot.

Pensions Paid First
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark Glennon

The same could be said for any news organization that has an agenda. Including this site.

debtsor
4 years ago

Every ‘news’ organization has an agenda. It’s just a question of whether or not you want your news organization to feed you outright lies. I like to use the Russia hoax as the best example of this. The Trump Russia hoax was fabricated out of thin air by Hillary’s campaign team. They laundered the fabricated story to a Yahoo! reporter to give it legitimacy. And then the FBI used that fake story to launch an investigation. And this was reported on with baited breath by 95% of news organizations for years. But it was 100% fabricated and everyone knew it.… Read more »

Last edited 4 years ago by debtsor
Bobbi
4 years ago

They look you right in the eye, and just make stuff up. That’s a problem. A more serious problem is that half the population believes the lies.

Susan Beal
4 years ago

Thank God for these students! Perhaps all is not lost!

Freddy
4 years ago
Joan
4 years ago

What can they even be thinking by inviting somebody like CNN’s Stelter? Even my liberal neighbor friends know how awful he is. I really think everybody knows what is going on here but they do it anyway.

Pat S.
4 years ago
Reply to  Joan

It’s pure hubris.

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE