The high cost of creating affordable housing – Crain’s

Crain's Forum "Costs are driven by the byzantine rules of the federal tax credit system that require builders to assemble a "capital stack" of funders, each with sets of fees and requirements. On top of that comes ever more rigorous government standards for accessibility, sustainability and design. Developers and their architects win points from public agencies awarding the projects by striving for net zero carbon emissions by using materials such as solar panels, triple-pane windows and upgraded insulation."If a Martian dropped down from the sky and looked at how America develops affordable housing, they would think we're nuts," says Hipolito "Paul" Roldan, CEO of the nonprofit Hispanic Housing Development Corp. "They would be right."
20 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
taxpayer
3 months ago

I wonder how many of the commenters here have read the article, which is not now paywalled. It’s mainly about the complexity of funding subsidized housing, requiring many lawyers and consultants, and expensive finishes which the intended occupants might choose to forego in exchange for lower rent.
btw, the term “affordable” was proclaimed so we didn’t have to say “subsidized.” Which implies that market rate housing is unaffordable, which it obviously isn’t if somebody has rented it.

Old Joe
3 months ago

Nothing to see here. For a while you could move to Detroit and buy abandoned homes for one dollar.

mqyl
3 months ago
Reply to  Old Joe

Old Joe, if someone bought one of those homes in Detroit for one dollar, were they being ripped off?

mmack
3 months ago
Reply to  Old Joe

Yes, but you’d have to live in Detroit.

Ataraxis
3 months ago

Alternate headline:
The High Cost of Electing Democrats

Just a friendly reminder. NEVER vote for a Democrat.

Ex Illini
3 months ago
Reply to  Ataraxis

Chicago is a shining example of putting Democrats in charge for 75 years. Why doesn’t the national media ever talk about it?

Last edited 3 months ago by Ex Illini
Freddy
3 months ago
RON
3 months ago
Reply to  Freddy

Would you want to live in a tiny home ?

Pat S.
3 months ago
Reply to  RON

Why not?

RON
3 months ago
Reply to  Pat S.

It is just plain bad economics. Just take the cost to connect utilities to a tiny home , water, sewer , electricity these will cost more to connect than the cost of the building, Build for the long term. or get a Winnebago.

Pat S.
3 months ago
Reply to  RON

Okay, you make a good point. Thanks!

debtsor
3 months ago

The other issue with affordable housing is that affordable housing is not to modern standards. My grandparents purchased a home in the Chicago suburbs during the 1950’s on a laborer’s wage. It was 1,000 sq ft, on an unfinished crawl space (no basement), a small combined kitchen/dining room with a formica countertop, a cheapie range, a small living room, three small bedrooms off to the side, and one small bathroom, and a one car detached garage. It was a tiny stick frame with cheapie siding, little if any insulation, and zero modern amenities like a dishwasher, internet hard wiring, no… Read more »

taxpayer
3 months ago
Reply to  debtsor

The article implies that $200,000 to $300,000 apartments are “affordable.” In which case a $250,000 house would also be affordable.

debtsor
3 months ago

Illegal immigrants were estimated to be 7% of the city’s residents as of 2014. Since then, the city has doubled down on its sanctuary policies, and encouraged massive illegal immigration, nearly all of whom arrive here looking for ‘affordable’ and ‘low cost’ housing. At this point, the laws of supply and demand kicks in, and rents/housing prices skyrocket. It’s completely asinine that not one politician in Chicago has linked the lack of unaffordable housing to the massive waves of illegal immigrants seeking said “affordable housing”.

Old Joe
3 months ago
Reply to  debtsor

Debtsor, cause and effect is not usually a progs strong suit.

RON
3 months ago
Reply to  Old Joe

It is a supply and demand problem, the demand will always exceed supply. so a never ending political problem.

debtsor
3 months ago
Reply to  RON

Exactly, the demand to live anywhere in north america will always exceed the supply. For example, our neighbor to the north, Canada has also been allowing in legal immigrants during the past three years at a pace that, for it’s smaller size, exceeds the US’s legal immigration rate, even with illegals. They’ve let in nearly 500k immigrants a year for the last three years. As a result, during the past three years, Canadian housing prices have gone haywire, and are completely insane, parabolic almost, with the countrywide average housing price, after converting to US dollars, now being $585,000. The average… Read more »

Last edited 3 months ago by debtsor
Old Spartan
3 months ago

It is a national disgrace. These units cost three times what they should. And every one of the companies involved in these deals is on someone’s “approved” list either at CHA, IHDA or HUD. And don’t forget, one of the biggest disasters in US low income housing history is the CHA Scattered Site Program, run into the ground by Valerie Jarrett when she was Chairman of the CHA. Hundreds of millions over budget and years behind schedule with no accountability.

Where's Mine ???
3 months ago

so,,,at a astounding $800,000 a unit cost of affordable housing a $100 mil Real-estate Transfer Tax will create a minuscule 125 new apartment units at best after all the mountains of bureaucrats, minority set-asides, special interests, etc, etc pick the $100 mil clean…RIDICULOUS!! also, CTU, SEIU, etc will be looking to get their cut to $$pay$$ for homeless services at astronomical cost as well

Truth in Cook County
3 months ago

Yes, government policies and government / unions in general are a racket in Illinois. Everyone gets their cut, which makes substantial affordable housing efforts unaffordable for the taxpayer. For all the talk, the number of units they deliver is lost in the rounding.

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check all you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

Don’t forget the same lawmakers who are ‘defending’ Chicago’s selective enrollment schools also ended school choice – Wirepoints on AM 560 Chicago’s Morning Answer

Ted joined Dan and Amy to talk about Chicago’s latest bond offering, why Chicago’s dismal home value growth is due to poor policies, the next $70 million to be spent on migrants, the 9% salary hikes demanded by the CTU, and why Illinois lawmakers voting to stop Chicago’s selective enrollment schools from being closed is hypocritical.

Read More »

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE