Trump admin wants to stop Evanston’s reparations effort for ‘simply handing out money based on race’ – FOX News

"There are sound ways for a city to remedy past discrimination or direct resources to its most vulnerable citizens and neighborhoods," Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division stated in the filing. "Simply handing out money based on race, however, is not the answer. It is race discrimination, pure and simple. And it is illegal."
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
AdrianStone
1 month ago

This statement is drawing a clear line between targeted support for disadvantaged communities and policies that explicitly distribute benefits based on race. The argument is that while addressing inequality and historical disadvantage is important, the method matters legally and constitutionally. From that perspective, race-based allocation is seen as problematic because it treats individuals differently on the basis of race rather than focusing on need or socioeconomic factors. At the same time, this is a highly debated area, because many argue that past discrimination has often been tied to race itself, so race-conscious remedies can sometimes be viewed as necessary to… Read more »

EvanWoods
1 month ago
Reply to  AdrianStone

I think the key point is that there’s a difference between helping disadvantaged communities and creating policies that distribute benefits based on race alone. Many people support assistance based on financial hardship or opportunity, arguing it treats everyone by the same standard. Others believe race-conscious policies are still needed because discrimination has had lasting effects that aren’t fully captured by income or class. That’s why this issue remains so controversial, with reasonable arguments on both sides. VegasStars Australia offers an online casino experience with a variety of slots, table games, and promotional https://vegastars-aus.co.com/ bonuses.

Riverbender
2 months ago

I guess Evanston wants higher taxes; that’s all I can figure.

David F
2 months ago

They shouldn’t even bother sending a lawyer to try and defend this, the court shouldn’t last but 5 minutes at most on a decision.

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE