Chicago’s political leadership is floating a pension buyout program as evidence it is seriously addressing the city’s thirty-six-billion-dollar unfunded pension liability, but Mark Glennon, founder of the Illinois policy research organization Wirepoints, said that the proposal moves debt from one column to another rather than reducing it, and that the broader fiscal picture facing the city continues to deteriorate across every measurable dimension. Audio here.
I have visited the Chicago area every year for the past 10 or so years. In 2019, before Covid, the Dirksen Federal Building had all kinds of foot traffic inside their ground floor lobby. Since that time, during every visit to the Loop during a weekday, I could have rolled a truck load of bowling balls thru the lobby and would have not hit a person. I don’t know where the feds are, but they are not in the Dirksen Federal Building.
Largely other’s money I suspect. Most advisors want us to put X into real estate funds and some rush to projects with government tenants. Perhaps over-concentration. Let the class actions commence. In five years the lawyers will divvy up the settlement funds and the class members can buy an extra large frappe st Starbucks.
More sales to come. Downtown is not a place people want to go to anymore. Much too dangerous.
I call bullshit in the GSA saying that the 5.3 million sq ft (!!!) of federal buildings in Chicago only have a vacancy rate of only 8%. That is totally unbelievable. We know that due to remote work, federal buildings in Washington DC have at best a 6% occupancy rate. The Tribune also notes that Chicago office vacancy rates are at 23%. But we are supposed to believe that the federal buildings in Chicago are 92% occupied??? Here’s the other red flag based on the empty buildings in Washington DC. I would argue that the Chicago government swamp creatures are… Read more »