Jim Dey: Details aside, Pritzker’s tax plan will appeal to many – News-Gazette

“If the amendment passes and Pritzer’s proposed rates do not produce sufficient revenue, he and legislators could — and certainly would — boost the rates and change income categories to meet their revenue goals.

Pritzker argues that kind of flexibility is necessary for effective governance. But his position bolsters critics’ claims that he’s asking voters to sign a “blank check” progressive tax plan.”

Read More »

A tax for Illinois that, thankfully, puts the middle class first – Editorial – Chicago Sun-Times

Comment: It’s game on for class warfare as Illinois’ left would have it. Those objecting to Pritzker’s new tax, this says, are “ideological servants of the country club set [warning] that folks like our former governor, Bruce Rauner, might pack up their cigar rooms and decamp to Florida.” Maybe the Sun-Times didn’t see Warren Buffet’s comments about states like Illinois, linked here, which were widely republished nationally but almost entirely ignored in Illinois.

Read More »

An unorthodox argument against the Obama Center – Crain’s

Last month, U.S. District Court Judge Robert Blakey ruled that the suit can proceed, despite the city’s motion to dismiss. In his ruling, Blakey swatted aside the First Amendment argument, saying that the matter called for speculation and that the court cannot rule on things that might or might not happen. Spokespeople for Protect Our Parks, however, say they’re keeping the First Amendment argument in their back pockets for future use.

Read More »